![]() ![]() What was going on? How did Asian Americans as a group wind up at the center of the controversy over affirmative action in college admissions, when no Asian American individual has evidently come forward to lend their name to a lawsuit? Why were Gorsuch and Alito comparing Harvard's treatment of Asian Americans today to its treatment of Jews a century ago? Could it really be true that Harvard was discriminating against Asian Americans "in the same manner in which it discriminated against Jews in the 1920s and 1930s," to use the words of the LDB-SVCAF brief ? How did Asian Americans as a group wind up at the center of the controversy over affirmative action in college admissions, when no Asian American individual has evidently come forward to lend their name to a lawsuit? What do we do about the fact that "Harvard's move to a holistic application approach happened in the 1920s because it wanted to impose a quota on Jewish applicants"? How do we reckon with how Harvard once used "diversity as a subterfuge for racial quotas?" "What do we do about history here," he asked, sounding scandalized. It took Justice Neil Gorsuch only a short time to pick up the cue. Brandeis Center for Human Rights and the Silicon Valley Chinese Association Foundation (LDB-SVCAF) in the amicus brief they filed in support of SSFA. ![]() Norris glided over what Harvard was doing, exactly, but his charge echoed the arguments made by the Louis D. Norris, who once clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas, compared "what Harvard is doing to Asians" to "what it was doing to Jews in the 1920s." In his opening statement, SFFA's Cameron T. This month's oral arguments about affirmative action before the Supreme Court featured a slickly executed call-and-response between the attorney for Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) and several of the justices in the conservative majority. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |